- 08 Sep, 2022 3 commits
-
-
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472974903 (cherry picked from commit 260aabb6)
christosts committed -
Test that HDR editing succeeds on devices supporting HDR editing, tone maps on devices supporting tone mapping, and throws exceptions on all other devices. Also, only restrict HDR editing and tone mapping support to API 31+ only when transcoding, not for all transformations. PiperOrigin-RevId: 472958965 (cherry picked from commit 0d8fd3d4)
huangdarwin committed
-
- 07 Sep, 2022 4 commits
-
-
The exception fires when intent resolution fails to find a service which declares an appropriate intent-filter. The existing message is confusing; it's trying to say that the service couldn't be found but the double negative renders it incorrect. #cleanup #minor-release PiperOrigin-RevId: 472736740 (cherry picked from commit 15d3d74e)
Googler committed -
If the back buffer is using too much memory, there is a risk playback could get stuck because LoadControl refuses to load further data. This eventually results in a stuck-buffering playback error. We can detect this case, clear the back buffer and then ask the LoadControl again to avoid failing playback in such a case. PiperOrigin-RevId: 472679797 (cherry picked from commit 310e0fec)
tonihei committed
- 06 Sep, 2022 3 commits
-
-
The stream offset is used to calculate the presentation time of a metadata object when reading and later when playing, to calculate the current presentation time to decide whether to send the metadata to the output. Accordingly, the presentation time of a pending metadata that has been calculated with a given offset needs to be recalculated when the stream offset changes. #minor-release PiperOrigin-RevId: 472499943 (cherry picked from commit 0896c4dd)
bachinger committed
- 30 Sep, 2022 2 commits
-
-
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472488921 (cherry picked from commit a18ab374)
Marc Baechinger committed -
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472475124 (cherry picked from commit cec6f045)
Marc Baechinger committed
-
- 06 Sep, 2022 3 commits
-
- 05 Sep, 2022 5 commits
-
-
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg` (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (2 times) * This catch block catches an exception and re-throws another, but swallows the caught exception rather than setting it as a cause. This can make debugging harder. (see http://go/bugpattern/UnusedException) * This comment contains Javadoc or HTML tags, but isn't started with a double asterisk (/**); is it meant to be Javadoc? (see http://go/bugpattern/AlmostJavadoc) This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it! This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do: * Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>" * File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content. * File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed. * Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead: go/clrobot-opt-out. This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings (go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA. Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug. #codehealth Tested: Local presubmit tests passed. PiperOrigin-RevId: 472255768 (cherry picked from commit 3a2e0d37)
Googler committed -
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg` (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times) This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it! This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do: * Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>" * File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content. * File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed. * Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead: go/clrobot-opt-out. This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings (go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA. Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug. #codehealth Tested: Local presubmit tests passed. PiperOrigin-RevId: 472254253 (cherry picked from commit 573ad66f)
Googler committed -
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg` (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it! This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do: * Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>" * File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content. * File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed. * Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead: go/clrobot-opt-out. This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings (go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA. Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug. #codehealth Tested: Local presubmit tests passed. PiperOrigin-RevId: 472252461 (cherry picked from commit 83485bc5)
Googler committed -
No functional changes. PiperOrigin-RevId: 472245797 (cherry picked from commit fa1f09fc)
huangdarwin committed
- 02 Sep, 2022 3 commits
-
-
The assertion asserts against a `Period` and an `AdPlaybackState` which actually asserts against a resolved ad which is what `ExoPlayerImplInternal` does later and what gives us a `SEEK_ADJUSTMENT`. However, this assertion is not required at the moment of masking, because we are sure that the resolved seek results in a content period and never an ad period. #minor-release Issue: androidx/media#122 PiperOrigin-RevId: 471827072 (cherry picked from commit 73f86682)
bachinger committed -
shouldPassthrough's internal checks seem to be check whether we should *not* pass through, which seemed a bit like a confusing double-negative to me. shouldTranscode is slightly more clear, by instead returning true when we do want to transcode. No functional changes intended. PiperOrigin-RevId: 471753771 (cherry picked from commit 7085c2fa)
huangdarwin committed
-
- 01 Sep, 2022 2 commits
-
-
https://github.com/androidx/media/commit/3b0d2c15867b3698f130476736785d427b28b7bd made `shouldPassthrough` always return false for `enableHdrVideoEditing`: >We force using `FrameEditor` (no passthrough) to avoid the need to select another edit operation, and use the new shaders. The `EGLContext` and `EGLSurface` also need to be set up differently for this path. However, this was introduced before the `videoNeedsEncoding` setting was introduced in https://github.com/androidx/media/commit/3f615040c033a37f81b1d73605cd1f7d420b47b5. That setting should apply to HDR videos as much as SDR videos. PiperOrigin-RevId: 471569853 (cherry picked from commit bc88f8be)
Googler committed -
Replacing remaining usage of MoreExecutors.directExecutor. This allows the service to be switched to run in another process and the app still works the same as if it is running in the same process. Issue: androidx/media#100 PiperOrigin-RevId: 471547177 (cherry picked from commit 9a674543)
rohks committed
-
- 31 Aug, 2022 3 commits
-
-
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg` (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times) This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it! This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do: * Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>" * File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content. * File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed. * Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead: go/clrobot-opt-out. This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings (go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA. Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug. #codehealth Tested: Local presubmit tests passed. PiperOrigin-RevId: 471198016 (cherry picked from commit 6d3cc01d)
Googler committed
- 30 Aug, 2022 8 commits
-
-
In particular, make it a bit more clear that "rendering" and "releasing" frames are related concepts, and how they differ from one another in conjunction with frame dropping. PiperOrigin-RevId: 471037733 (cherry picked from commit 69714e5f)
huangdarwin committed -
Separate MatrixTransformationProcessor constructors by color input and output. PiperOrigin-RevId: 471034768 (cherry picked from commit 1b648296)
huangdarwin committed -
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg` (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (19 times) This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it! This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do: * Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>" * File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content. * File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed. * Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead: go/clrobot-opt-out. This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings (go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA. Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug. #codehealth Tested: Local presubmit tests passed. PiperOrigin-RevId: 471022923 (cherry picked from commit b48ca6e0)
Googler committed -
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471008623 (cherry picked from commit 3ba8bb71)
huangdarwin committed -
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg` (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it! This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do: * Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>" * File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content. * File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed. * Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead: go/clrobot-opt-out. This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings (go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA. Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug. #codehealth Tested: Local presubmit tests passed. PiperOrigin-RevId: 470953422 (cherry picked from commit 52d32be8)
Googler committed -
This should now expect transformation to succeed. PiperOrigin-RevId: 470950411 (cherry picked from commit daf1e5e2)
andrewlewis committed
-
- 26 Aug, 2022 2 commits
-
-
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470354448 (cherry picked from commit dbe66775)
andrewlewis committed -
TL;DR: we should check if there are new frames available to queue to the ExternalTextureProcessor before actually queueing a frame. The overall flow on the external texture processor: - `SurfaceTexture.onFrameAvailable` is called on `ExtTexMgr`, and - it calls `updateTexImage()`, and sets `frame` - it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()` - the frame is queued to `ExtTexProc` if `frame` is set - From `ExtTexProc.queueInputFrame()`: - notifies the `frameProcessorListener` of available frame - notifies the `inputListener` of `onReadyToAcceptInputFrame` - (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()` again -- Parallelly -- - `ExtTexProc` calls `inputListener.onInputFrameProcessed`, when the frame is released - (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), sets `frame` to `null` *Problem* This logic relies on `frame` to be cleared at the right time. In transformer, it's OK b/c `ExtTexProc` release the frame immediately in `queueInputFrame()` and calls `onInputFrameProcessed` which also reset `frame` But in previewing, the frame is not released for a while, up to 10 ms. In this case, `frame` will not reset in this 10 ms, and `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()` is repeatedly queueing the same input frame. PiperOrigin-RevId: 470211620 (cherry picked from commit 91709831)claincly committed
-
- 25 Aug, 2022 2 commits
-