SDK / exoplayer

* Refactor caching for matrix transformations to reuse it for rgb matrices.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 473042194

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472974903

Test that HDR editing succeeds on devices supporting HDR editing, tone maps on
devices supporting tone mapping, and throws exceptions on all other devices.

Also, only restrict HDR editing and tone mapping support to API 31+ only when
transcoding, not for all transformations.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472958965

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472949850

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472745311

The exception fires when intent resolution fails to find a service which declares an appropriate intent-filter. The existing message is confusing; it's trying to say that the service couldn't be found but the double negative renders it incorrect.

#cleanup
#minor-release

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472736740

#minor-release

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472714732

If the back buffer is using too much memory, there is a risk
playback could get stuck because LoadControl refuses to load
further data. This eventually results in a stuck-buffering
playback error.

We can detect this case, clear the back buffer and then ask
the LoadControl again to avoid failing playback in such a case.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472679797

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472522846

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472500789

The stream offset is used to calculate the presentation time of
a metadata object when reading and later when playing, to calculate
the current presentation time to decide whether to send the metadata
to the output.

Accordingly, the presentation time of a pending metadata that has been
calculated with a given offset needs to be recalculated when the
stream offset changes.

#minor-release

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472499943

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472488921

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472475124

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472459423

* Replace ImmutableLists to List interface for constructors

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472433434

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472405147

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472325145

* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
  (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (2 times)
* This catch block catches an exception and re-throws another, but swallows the caught exception rather than setting it as a cause. This can make debugging harder.
  (see http://go/bugpattern/UnusedException)
* This comment contains Javadoc or HTML tags, but isn't started with a double asterisk (/**); is it meant to be Javadoc?
  (see http://go/bugpattern/AlmostJavadoc)

This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.

This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.

#codehealth

Tested:
    Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472255768

* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
  (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times)

This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.

This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.

#codehealth

Tested:
    Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472254253

* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
  (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment)

This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.

This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.

#codehealth

Tested:
    Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472252461

No functional changes.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 472245797

The assertion asserts against a `Period` and an `AdPlaybackState` which actually
asserts against a resolved ad which is what `ExoPlayerImplInternal` does later and
what gives us a `SEEK_ADJUSTMENT`. However, this assertion is not required at the
moment of masking, because we are sure that the resolved seek results in a content
period and never an ad period.

#minor-release
Issue: androidx/media#122
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471827072

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471782565

shouldPassthrough's internal checks seem to be check whether we should *not*
pass through, which seemed a bit like a confusing double-negative to me.

shouldTranscode is slightly more clear, by instead returning true when we do
want to transcode.

No functional changes intended.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471753771

https://github.com/androidx/media/commit/3b0d2c15867b3698f130476736785d427b28b7bd made `shouldPassthrough` always return false for `enableHdrVideoEditing`:

>We force using `FrameEditor` (no passthrough) to avoid the need to select another edit operation, and use the new shaders. The `EGLContext` and `EGLSurface` also need to be set up differently for this path.

However, this was introduced before the `videoNeedsEncoding` setting was introduced in https://github.com/androidx/media/commit/3f615040c033a37f81b1d73605cd1f7d420b47b5. That setting should apply to HDR videos as much as SDR videos.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471569853

Replacing remaining usage of MoreExecutors.directExecutor. This allows the service to be switched to run in another process and the app still works the same as if it is running in the same process.

Issue: androidx/media#100
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471547177

`contentTitle` and `contentText` can now be overridden.

Issue: androidx/media#150
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471287701

* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
  (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times)

This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.

This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.

#codehealth

Tested:
    Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471198016

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471137219

In particular, make it a bit more clear that "rendering" and "releasing" frames are
related concepts, and how they differ from one another in conjunction with frame
dropping.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471037733

Separate MatrixTransformationProcessor constructors by color input and output.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471034768

* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
  (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (19 times)

This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.

This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.

#codehealth

Tested:
    Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471022923

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471017440

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471008623

#minor-release

PiperOrigin-RevId: 470999044

* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
  (see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment)

This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.

This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.

#codehealth

Tested:
    Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470953422

This should now expect transformation to succeed.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 470950411

PiperOrigin-RevId: 470354448

TL;DR: we should check if there are new frames available to queue to the
ExternalTextureProcessor before actually queueing a frame.

The overall flow on the external texture processor:

- `SurfaceTexture.onFrameAvailable` is called on `ExtTexMgr`, and
  - it calls `updateTexImage()`, and sets `frame`
  - it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()`
    - the frame is queued to `ExtTexProc` if `frame` is set

  - From `ExtTexProc.queueInputFrame()`:
    - notifies the `frameProcessorListener` of available frame
    - notifies the `inputListener` of `onReadyToAcceptInputFrame`
      - (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()`
       again

-- Parallelly --
- `ExtTexProc` calls `inputListener.onInputFrameProcessed`, when the frame is
released
  - (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), sets `frame` to `null`

*Problem*

This logic relies on `frame` to be cleared at the right time.

In transformer, it's OK b/c `ExtTexProc` release the frame immediately in
`queueInputFrame()` and calls `onInputFrameProcessed` which also reset `frame`

But in previewing, the frame is not released for a while, up to 10 ms.
In this case, `frame` will not reset in this 10 ms, and
`maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()` is repeatedly queueing the same input frame.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 470211620

Native multidex can only be used for binaries with minSdkVersion of 21 or higher, but minSdkVersion was specified to 16.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 470004102